stagnant at all times.
The Leaders explained that with random numbers it is impossible to have such a graph and as such argued that the results were manipulated. "There was the bizarre phenomenon of Uhuru Kenyatta’s “lead” staying at around a consistent 11 percent throughout the release of the “results!” surprisingly, this same pattern also occurred in many gubernatorial races across the country.
"Such a fixed margin has never been maintained throughout any democratic election anywhere in the world. But it happened here because an algorithm had been introduced to rig the outcome," the opposition submitted.
SEE ALSO: Here is Raila Odinga's Full Statement on NASA Moving to Court to Fight Uhuru Kenyatta's ''Computer Generated'' Win
4. Declaration of Incomplete Results
NASA accuses IEBC of declaring incomplete Presidential results. According to the opposition leaders, the polls body hurriedly declared incomplete results without verifying all the Form 34As.
"Then, at midnight last Friday, we saw the IEBC announce that Uhuru Kenyatta had been elected president, even though the Commission continued to acknowledge that only about 29,000 of the 41,000 verified Forms 34As had been tallied!
"Why was there this fanatical rush to judgment...CONTINUE READING IN PAGE 2>>>
PAGE 1 2 3